I would encourage the person who reviews and approves opinions for the paper to consider what I think is “exceptionally” out of bounds opinions. I’m pretty convinced your paper is trying to further divide readers. Two of such opinions are in the Nov. 21 paper.  

There may come a time (I hope so) when a news outlet allows these sort of opinions is held legally responsible for potential loss. By loss I refer to reputation, job harassment, stalking, discrimination.

I’m certain you have language in your submission process to avoid potential litigation but clearly we know your judgment of “what”’you do with what you get is not exempt from risk.

Most of us accept differences in opinions. What we don’t want are excessive assertions of those who are way off the mark. Please clean your act up.

Charles Jones

Green Valley

Better than a comments section

Discuss the news on NABUR,
a place to have local conversations

The Neighborhood Alliance for Better Understanding and Respect
A site just for our local community
Focused on facts, not misinformation
Free for everyone

Join the community
What's NABUR?