Letters


Print this story | | Comment (4 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

Community Columnist--Socialism and health care: It works

By John Milland
Published: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:42 PM MST


Let’s talk about the dreaded “S” word. No, not sex. But ... hold on for a sec... socialism.

Talk radio seems to be obsessed that socialism is about to run rampant over us unless we take to the bunkers. Gun sales have skyrocketed and ammo is getting hard to get. Speak of defacto militias! Talk radio and their bed partners in print seem to have convinced the convincible that just around the next corner Obama is about to suspend the Constitution, replace it with a politburo, declare martial law and impose socialism on all of us.

The mantra is that socialism is bad, therefore any fruit from that tree must also be bad.

Let’s see if this is true. So we are all on the same page, let’s go to a dictionary and define socialism. I am using the Oxford American Dictionary and I am condensing it but not changing it: Production, distribution and exchange should be regulated or controlled by the community.

Now let’s see where that leaves us. For starters, it appears that the FBI falls smack into the middle of that category. What! A socialist FBI? But they are regulated, paid and their production is controlled by the community (read government). And then there is the police department and the fire department and the CIA and then, of course, the Army and the Navy and the Air Force and the Coast Guard, and let’s not forget the Marine Corps. The Marine Corps is a socialistic organization? Well, I guess so. And let’s not forget the VA.

According to the mantra, all of these must be bad. But are they really? Each has had its problems, such as the alleged $700 toilet seat that the Air Force had to sit on for a while, but every large, privately owned and controlled corporation has had its “toilet seat” fiascos, but these dumb-mistake incidents just remained a very quiet “private venture” mistake unless it was something like Ford’s Edsel. Note that the most recent cascading crash of financial houses is a result of private leadership and private ownership.


The point here is that government regulation is not automatically bad and deregulation automatically good. When greed is salivating for the quick buck that in the end hurts the majority of us (how did your 401(k) do last year?) strong regulations with strong enforcement powers are needed. The market does not regulate itself. Sources for this heresy are simple. Look at history: 1929, 1980s, 2000 and now.

Our medical system is in a mess and a leading cause of many personal bankruptcies leading to disaster. A one-payer system is not, repeat not, socialized medicine but it does cut out about 30 percent of the cost as a starter.

According to Ewe Reinhardt, Ph.D. (Princeton health economist) socialized medicine is where the government owns and operates both the financing of health care and its delivery. The VA is a perfect example of socialized medicine in the USA. If the VA system of classic socialized medicine is so evil, then why didn’t the Republicans privatize it when they had both houses and the presidency? I have several friends who have used the VA facilities in Tucson and Seattle and have yet to hear of bad treatment. I am sure that one could find a “bad treatment case,” but one can find “bad treatment cases” at any health facility.

Check into Canada’s medical system. Despite what the talk radio folk would have you believe, the Canadian system is not socialized medicine but a single-payer insurance system. Have you noticed that the sources of negative stories regarding Canada are from those with vested financial health care interests here in the U.S.? That’s a little like taking advice from your bookie on which horse to bet on. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD health data 2008), lists Canada second and the U.S. eighth in a list of eight industrialized nations in life expectancy, shows that Canada spends about 10 percent of her GDP on health care while we are spending 15.3 percent. Canada spends 16.7 percent of government revenue for health care while we spend 18.5 percent. The comparison goes on and on with the U.S. getting the least bang for the buck. After all, top CEOs need their perks.

So much for the concept that only privatization can lead to anything good.

John Milland is retired from network broadcast television and post production facilities in Los Angeles, working with both news and production departments. He has been a resident of Green Valley for 10 years.



Previous   Next
Guest Commentary: Expand list for airport screening   Healing Health Care: Canada’s health care system worth a look

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.5 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of gvnews.com.

Jane Horton-Leasman wrote on Jan 24, 2010 8:20 AM:

" It is interesting that you talk about, as an example of Socialism working, the VA.

A client and dear friend waited for 3 months before he could have the tumor removed from his kidney, and now is waiting another 4 months before the entire kidney can be removed...and all of this as a result of the Tucson VA waiting to get the "team" together that performs the surgeries. All the while he has pre-existing prostate cancer, which my husband died from. Having been through similar surgeries with my husbands prostate cancer/kidney/bladder cancers, his final surgery resulted in the surgeon coming out of the final surgery and telling me he had 3 months to live. He died 2 days before the 3 months ended. AND, WE HAD EXPERT PRIVATE PHYSICANS, WITH QUICK, CONSECUTIVE SURGERIES.

Already, without the "public health care" being enacted, costs and wait times have gone up.

And, you believe "Socialism" is good and works. Communism and complete control of our lives is merely SOCIALISM ON STEROIDS.

See how well this works for you, when God help you, it is your only recourse. "

OlGlory wrote on Jan 24, 2010 10:13 AM:

" Socialism and communism (its cousin on steroids) have proven time and again throughout the world to be failed systems. I regret that our country has incrementally inched (much faster recently) in that direction. Hopefully the results of recent elections are a sign that the American people are coming to their senses and will reverse that trend. Why those on the left are obsessed with "talk radio", its popularity and effects baffles me. Surely a forum for the free exchange of ideas enjoyed by ordinary folks is no threat to the elite. Or is it? Maybe liberals should try their own talk forum....oh wait (Air America RIP) "

DFLer wrote on Jan 25, 2010 2:52 PM:

" Jane, everyone has horror stories about healthcare in this country, whether from the VA or private docs. Making coverage universal won't change that, but it will at least give people with NO options a chance at SOME options. The Canadian system is one we should look seriously at, not spread rumors and untrths about. Obama tried to do what should have been done decades ago...but big business and special interests (funding politicians on both sides of the aisle) appear to have won out again. "

rye wrote on Jan 26, 2010 6:21 PM:

" Posters, your knees are jerking again. In the context in which the term socialism is currently being used by the right, it's an excuse to rail against the government intervention necessary to lead the country out of the quagmire Obama found it in..
His weakness has been his propensity to pander to the right, rather than to stick to his campaign promises. bi partisanship is long gone, and Obama iearning the hard way. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Return to: Letters « | Home « | Top of Page ^
 
Today's Weather
Green Valley, AZ


sponsored by:





Top Menus