NewsTUCSON — Community Water Co. of Green Valley appears likely to get most of its requested 26 percent rate increase by next spring, but key state regulators want a stiffer rate hike than the company has proposed for homeowners who use a lot of water. During an all-day hearing Wednesday in Tucson, staff of the Arizona Corporation Commission said they agreed with much of the company’s overall revenue request, but wanted a more conservation-oriented rate structure. The company originally asked for a 33 percent overall increase, then reduced it to 26.58 percent, because electricity expenses were reduced because they received credits for overpayment in the past. ACC staff has recommended the water company get a 26.27 percent increase. Community Water also wants to hike its evening and weekend call-out rate to a $70 minimum from the current $10 rate, arguing that the low rate encourages customers to call the water company to shut off their water when they should call a plumber. Staff of the ACC questioned that request closely, and CWC President Arturo Gabald—n admitted the utility had not conducted a formal cost study on the matter, but simply used the cost of calling a plumber in Green Valley as a rule of thumb. The hearing was held before ACC Administrative Law Judge Belinda Martin, who asked to have briefs summarizing the positions of both sides by Dec. 8. She is expected to issue a Recommended Order and Opinion in 30 to 45 days and the matter could go before the five-member commission in late January or in February, meaning the new rates would go into effect in March. The original rate request is on the company’s Web site, www.communitywater.com, and follow-up documents are available on the ACC Web site under _E-docket, with the case number 08-0590. Gabald—n said the major reason for the rate-increase request, in addition to increasing cost of electricity, interest expense, gasoline and retirement contributions, is that the company had to pay to build a large storage facility uphill from customers. The company now must pay to pump water uphill, but that arrangement will allow it to use a gravity-feed system of supplying water, thus largely solving a past problem of occasional water outages, he said. Gabald—n said outside the hearing that the company for years used a flat-rate structure that did not penalize heavy water users and in recent years has moved to different rates based on monthly water volume to promote conservation. However, he said that too great a movement in that direction would make revenues too volatile. In the event of extreme weather conditions, such as an unusually rainy season, customers would use less water for irrigation needs, driving down overall consumption and hurting revenues badly, Gabald—n said. Martin grilled Gabald—n on conservation measures in general, saying that is a focus of the commissioners. She asked several questions about the company’s proposal to operate a pipeline that would be paid for by the Rosemont Copper mine to get access to Central Arizona Project water at Pima Mine Road. In other matters, Gabald—n noted that growth in the company’s service area has increased to 4 percent in 2009 despite the national housing slump. He said water losses peaked at about 9 percent several years ago and now are inching downward toward 7 percent. He said the company believes high water losses resulted from the relative inaccuracy of large meters used by construction customers and the fact that polyethyline pipes installed in the 1970s were breaking. The company now has a $150,000 a year budget to replace aging pipes with copper pipes, which have been used exclusively since the early 1990s. Community Water Co. is a member-owned, non-profit water utility located in Southern Arizona, in unincorporated Pima County and the Town of Sahuarita, serving an average of 2.1 million gallons of water per day to approximately 18,000 people. The service area is approximately eight square miles, existing roughly between Anamax Road to the north, the Santa Cruz River to the east, Cyprus Sierrita to the west, and Mission Twin Buttes Road to the south. pfranchine@gvnews.com | 547-9738
Article RatingReader Comments
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of gvnews.com. C. Gordon wrote on Nov 1, 2009 11:25 AM: " It has been proven conclusively that when people cut back on their water usage in the name of conservation, the water rates go up because of loss of revenue. Pushing for higher rates to force conservation will only result in continually increasing rates to replace the revenues lost as a result of the conservation. I don't personally see a lot of 'wasted' water going on to imply that consumers are not already in a conservation mode. Do they really means 2.1M gal/18,000 people or 18,000 customers (which includes businesses such as the Octopus car wash)? " Tom Wilton wrote on Nov 3, 2009 12:05 AM: " The root of the problem is unreasonable growth being approved by the City of Sahuarita and the County. This used to be a nice little community with a couple of golf courses and everyone had native, drought tolerant vegetation. We knew we lived in a desert and water needed to be conserved. Unfortunately many of the "Johnnie -Come-Latelys" think its the "land of a thousand lakes", wasting water like mad, demanding more water recreational facilities, planting non-native water guzzling plants, installing "water features", and oh yes, washing their cars at Octopus. I've long though GVR should put water restrictors in the locker room showers and cut back on some of their other non-conservation oriented activities such as parking lot lighting and flashing neon signs 24 hours a day at West Center. This community is being ruined because of the population growth. " Submit a Comment |
Today's Weather
Green Valley, AZ
sponsored by: ![]() Top Menus |
Copyright © 2010 Green Valley News and Sun - All right Reserved
About Us / Subscriptions / Contact Us / Advertise with us / User Agreement / HUD rules / Make us your home page
About Us / Subscriptions / Contact Us / Advertise with us / User Agreement / HUD rules / Make us your home page

Please visit our 



Jane Horton-Leasman wrote on Nov 1, 2009 10:19 AM:
For the Community Water Company to demand more from me....WHICH WILL LIKEWISE INCREASE THE AMOUNT I PAY FOR SEWER...WHEN I USE MINIMAL WATER...is OUTRAGEOUS!
POLITICS has taken over Green Valley, and from top to bottom...GREEN VALLEY IS CONSIDERED THE ATM FOR EVERY BUSINESS AND UTILITY SUPPLIER. But, with the new MENTALITY moving in to GV it is understandable...."the taxes aren't as high as where I/We came from..." BS! Why do you move here, to just find ways to tax long-time residents...for your WANTS YOU LEFT???? Your "LEFT" POLITICS will turn us in to just a repeat of what you created where you came from!!!!
The ATTRACTION to GV (area) is quickly dissolving...and, it is all up to everyone to decide as a COMMUNITY what kind of life we want for the future.... "