Breaking News


Print this story | | Comment (10 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

Civil GV crowd peppers Giffords with questions

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords addresses about 500 people at the West Social Center on Tuesday. Photo by Jaime Richardson | Green Valley News

By Philip Franchine, Green Valley News
Published: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 5:09 PM MST


Green Valley residents packed the house at Tuesday’s town hall on health care reform, peppering U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords with questions and applauding loudly for ideas on both sides of the issue.

An orderly crowd of about 500 rocked the West Social Center with applause for speakers who oppose government expanding its role in health care. There also was solid, though less boisterous, applause for pro-reform calls for universal health coverage and allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

About 100 people, many with signs, remained outside listening to the meeting on loudspeakers or radio as the hall filled up a half-hour before the 9 a.m. meeting.

Giffords told the crowd she is not wedded to any one of the reform plans before Congress, but wants to address the 50 million uninsured and 20 million underinsured in the country. She also supports negotiating drug prices and favors a public option that would offer the public the insurance coverage that is now available to federal employees.

“Giffords respectfully not only heard, but listened to the concerns expressed,” said Green Valley retiree Dave Rozanc, who is not a fan of reform.

Rozanc, a former insurance company employee, believes proposed spending on health-care reform will not pay for itself, and the excess spending will cause inflation that will hurt the investment income of senior citizens.


Pro-reformer Anne Marie Lindstrom of Green Valley, who was born with spina bifida and who spoke from a wheelchair, said, “single-payer please... I am absolutely uninsurable.” She said she had not landed some jobs because the insurance provider would not cover her.

Giffords said a single-payer approach, and the complexities it brings, is not on the table now.

Cynthia Rose of Tubac and Tucson, who said her husband is a military consultant, said, “When government takes control of banks, mortgage companies, car makers and, now, health care, we lose our freedoms,” generating big applause and some whoops.

Giffords said the government support of the auto industry is necessary in case we need to build tanks, for example, for a future war. She at various times carefully explained her votes against the initial bank bail-out, cars for clunkers and other government programs.

Giffords’ staff used a lottery system with tickets to determine who would get to ask questions.

“Health care is a human right,” Barbara Laupmanis of Green Valley said, drawing light applause and some boos. She said she has lupus, a chronic illness, is enrolled in Medicare, and recently paid $1,400 to Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

The Green Valley town hall came a day after about 1,300 people gathered at a high school in Sierra Vista to hear Giffords. That crowd was more boisterous, even booing former U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona, who spoke before Giffords answered questions.

Overall, the Green Valley crowd was exemplary, asking probing questions, telling poignant stories and offering important information for the congresswoman to consider as she returns to Washington.

One exchange between Giffords and a Green Valley man summarized the fears of many.

George Grygiel drew loud applause by saying, “for health care reform to bankrupt this country is immoral. Congress refuses to deal with reducing costs.”

Giffords said, “The change will not affect you all; it will affect younger folks. There is a lot of fear, anger and mistrust in the country.”

Grygiel responded, “The people are getting it crammed down our throats. We constituents do not trust government anymore.”

After the town hall, Giffords said the session was informative but acknowledged there is “a disconnect” on the part of numerous speakers who said they want no increased government role in health care but are pleased with their own government-funded coverage, whether Medicare, active military or Tri-Care.

Giffords said fellow Democrats must win her vote and the votes of others in the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition in order to pass a bill.

Laura Leick of Sahuarita, who is semi-retired, did not get to speak but was hoping to ask about banning insurers from using pre-existing conditions from dumping subscribers. Leick said she and her sister each retired before age 65 and are not eligible for Medicare and face either having no insurance, paying huge premiums or, in her case, buying an affordable policy with a $5,000 deductible.

Leick said she supports a public option as well as tort reform and said the event was helpful, though most attendees already have their views fixed, because “she (Giffords) did a good job listening and responding to those who wanted a response. There’s one woman who walked away. There’s passion in these things.”

pfranchine@sahuarita.com| 547-9738



  Next
  Continental board rejects grievance by teacher

Article Rating

Current Rating: 1.5 of 6 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of gvnews.com.

V. Andolini wrote on Sep 1, 2009 7:39 PM:

" The disconnect to which the Congresswoman refers is really between her and her constituents. "

Dennis Skelton wrote on Sep 1, 2009 8:37 PM:

" Mr. Franchine gives a good report of the meeting I attended.

I concur with his account of Congresswoman Giffords' statement about a "disconnect" between retired folks appreciating Medicare but not wanting government sponsored and mandated programs. She made a similar statement during the meeting.

However, I disagree with her on the statement. There is no "disconnect".

I do enjoy the Social Security payments, I do enjoy the Medicare coverage. The source of my enjoyment stems not from my appreciation for these programs but from the fact that I paid into these programs (not my choice) for over 50 years and 40 years respectively and that I lived long enough to collect on the contract my government wrote and signed for me. Except for the fact that these programs are going broke and will not support those that follow me, I am quite happy to receive the payments and coverage.
That is not to say I am happy with
these programs. They come at the cost of liberty, something that probably many at the meeting went into combat to preserve. There is no "disconnect" here, rather, the Congresswoman is not "connecting" with her constituency.

For my grandchildren I hope for programs that deliver them their American heritage, the
liberty of self-determination; the freedom to spend their property (money) in the way they see fit, not confiscated by the government.

I was born into that kind of an America, I wish to leave it in a better state than I found it. "

jonathan wrote on Sep 1, 2009 9:53 PM:

" The anti-health reform people are so incredibly ignorant and misled. I don't think they know how to think. "

Mickey Abbott wrote on Sep 2, 2009 9:37 AM:

" Now could we not say that the pro-health reform people are "incredibly ignorant and misled". This is the typical MO of the left. If you cannot argue with facts then go after the messenger.

Jonathan's comments add so much to civil discourse on the issue. He doesn't "think" that some of you know how to think. There is a valuable opinion you should take to heart. I am sure you will lose much sleep over his intelligent comment.

I thought there were people on both sides who had impotant contributions to make. This contribution here by Jonathan was not one of them. He has nothing to say to even advance his own position. "

Sara wrote on Sep 2, 2009 9:41 AM:

" I worked at IBM for 25 years. Taxes were taken out of my paycheck to pay for other to have Medicare, Va beneifits, Social Security. I was daignosed with cancer at age 43. I am now 49. The cancer is gone,but I am now unable to get insurance because of having cancer in the past. I am too young to get medicare. I can't afford to get my checkups or go to the doctor like I should.
I can't afford the medications I should be taking. I will loose my home if I happen to get sick again.
I paid for seniors and military people to get their benifits,but I'm left out. I worked hard all my life. Why am I left out? Why don't people care about each other in this country.. because you are covered with insurance, does it not matter to you? How would you feel if they decided that seniors do not need to be covered. You would feel just like I do.
It's not fair or right that everyone is not covered. "

D. Ciccio wrote on Sep 2, 2009 9:45 AM:

" "If you like your health care plan you can keep it". That is what we have been told.

Let me ask: If an employer decides to change the plan, can the employee say no I want to keep what I have? Where in any of the bills are employers forbidden from changing a plan? Please cite the bill and page number. "

Dee wrote on Sep 2, 2009 5:51 PM:

" Well said D. Ciccio. The problem we are having right now as State Employees. The department has cut our benefits down to almost no care in your home. Can they do this? Good question. We do not know until someone sues. Therefore, if some one needs 24 hour care at home and the company/government changes something then how can we not have law suits. The test for the people are law suits. Frivolous is a misused word that politicians love to use. A law suit is a law suit. If we do not have this power with any health plan including the governments then they will be able to do anything they want in the future. So.........Health Care Reform must cover every one, every thing, and allow law suits. Other wise we are not a democracy. "

dan-o wrote on Sep 2, 2009 8:12 PM:

" hey laura, i'm not sure how old you and your sister are. but wouldn't health insurance be someone's biggest concerns before they considered retiring early? or is that something the taxpayers are expected to pick up? just wondering. "

Frank Cortese wrote on Sep 3, 2009 7:27 PM:

" I recall in a previous blog on health care somebody talking about the guns (legal) being brought to one or two town halls. These were the gun totin right wing racist cretins who hate anything Obama. Guess what? Nobody got shot and nobody was arrested.

It has come to my attention that at a town hall meeting an Obama supporter bit off thefinger of a person who disagreed with him. Yikes! Change we can believe in. Hope the poor victim gets a rabies shot. Now not all Obama supporters are that rabid. I doubt that there are too many that would actually do this just as most Obama opponents do not carry guns to meetings.

But now let us hear them condemn this barbaric behavior. If they don't you know they support it even if they themselves would not bite off another person's finger. Maybe it was Mike Tyson. Oh, that was an ear.

SICK! "

J. Peterman wrote on Sep 7, 2009 2:53 PM:

" Today President Obama accused his critics of using lies to scare people regarding health care plans. From his own lips not too long ago, the President claimed that doctors would rather cut off the foot of a diabetic than to have provided preventive medicine before this became needed. Why? Becuase the surgery provides a bigger pay check. Really? The doctor through Medicare would have gotten one to two thousand for a 10-$20,000 surgery. Who is the liar or should I say liar in chief? Present your evidence Mr. President or shut up. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Return to: Breaking News « | Home « | Top of Page ^
 
Today's Weather
Green Valley, AZ


sponsored by:





Top Menus