News


Print this story | | Comment (12 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

Tubac checkpoint still a flashpoint

A sign on Gary Hembree’s car makes it clear where he stands on the Tubac checkpoint. Photo by Jaime Richardson

By Jaime Richardson
Published: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:35 PM MST


www.gvnews.com

The Border Patrol checkpoint north of Tubac is killing tourism, putting residents in harm’s way and costing million of dollars in home sales, according to local business owners.

But it’s also responsible for the seizure of tons of illegal drugs, hundreds of arrests and an increased sense of security in the area, Border Patrol officials say.

The value of the temporary checkpoint at the northbound Agua Linda Road exit has been debated for years, but it was stepped up with last week’s announcement that expansion will begin in June.

“The checkpoint is a safety hazard to the communities north and south of us,” said Carol Cullen, executive director of the Tubac Chamber of Commerce.

Cullen is concerned that smugglers looking to get around the checkpoint are driven up the Santa Cruz River, Anza Trail or along railroad tracks and gas lines, pushing them closer to homes and people.


She said construction of a permanent checkpoint, which hasn’t been scheduled yet, would make a bad problem worse.

Jim Green, owner of the Inn at San Ignacio, said the checkpoint has turned Green Valley into the Border Patrol’s “enforcement zone.”

He said the agents and their work is appreciated, but the dramatic increase in Border Patrol visibility since the temporary checkpoint went in two years ago gives the false impression that crime is up in the area.

“Even with all the problems, Green Valley is still a very safe community,” Green said. “But we need to take a hold of this before it gets out of hand.”

Green said Tubac used to be the primary tourist destination for his guests, but “they don’t want to go to Tubac anymore because it’s perceived as unsafe and unfriendly, because of the checkpoint.”

Goal: Permanent checkpoint

The Border Patrol is awaiting results of a Government Accountability Office report on the effectiveness of permanent checkpoints, which is expected as early as June.

Plans for a permanent checkpoint can’t be finalized until an interim facility is constructed and the GAO report is in because of language Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., included in a 2009 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Bill.

A permanent checkpoint could be years off, but the Border Patrol is moving forward to start building the interim checkpoint less than a mile south on I-19. It’s in the same spot where a permanent checkpoint would go in.

The interim facility will include a modular building with telephone and computer lines,

outdoor lighting and a canopy to protect agents and canines from the elements.

The permanent checkpoint would be much larger, with about 10 buildings on 25 acres, with six to eight paved lanes and a covered inspection area.

Interim improvements will cost about $1.5 million, while nearly $27 million for the permanent checkpoint is included in the 2008-09 fiscal year budget for the Department of Homeland Security.

The interim checkpoint has been at the northbound Agua Linda Road exit, between Tubac and Amado, since 2007. Checkpoints have existed along I-19 since 1987, but were temporary and were required to move every few weeks, according to the Border Patrol.

Bad for business?

Tubac is a quaint, historical town popular for its artisans and shopping.

David Camet, owner of The Crowe’s Nest clothing boutique in Tubac Village, said businesses rely heavily on local shoppers from communities north of the checkpoint. He said some customers, especially those from Green Valley, have called the checkpoint an inconvenience.

“People only come in now if they have to,” said Camet, who has owned the boutiques more than 10 years. “They don’t come to browse and enjoy a shopping day because they don’t want to have to wait 20 minutes in a line of cars to get home.”

Gary Hembree, owner of Old Presidio Traders, said the checkpoint has “done nothing to help business during these hard economic times.”

He said he has had Canadian customers ask if a passport is needed to get back through the checkpoint, and added that the presence of the checkpoint creates an atmosphere of apprehension and confusion that drives away return customers.

But Don Stout of Tucson, who was shopping in Tubac last week with out-of-town company, said driving through the checkpoint doesn’t bother him.

“The checkpoint makes me feel secure,” Stout said. “I don’t think it should scare anybody, unless they have something to hide.”

But real estate agents said they have lost millions of dollars in sales because of the checkpoint.

Zachary Freeland, director of new home sales for Brasher Realty in Tubac, said the company lost more than $5 million in home sales from buyers who signed contracts but had second thoughts after driving back through the checkpoint. He said at least twice as many people have told him they decided against buying a home in Tubac for the same reason.

“I’ve had people tell me, ‘I’m not going to drive through that thing every day,’ or that Tubac seems like a high-crime area,” Freeland said.

He’s been keeping track of the lost sales since 2004, but says the majority came after 2007, when the checkpoint became a permanent fixture north of Tubac.

Numbers are solid

Mike Scioli, a spokesman for the Tucson Sector of the Border Patrol, understands the opposition but points out that many residents are thankful for the “second layer of defense” against smugglers and other criminals.

Recently, the sector reported a decrease in arrests at the checkpoint, “which means it’s working,” Scioli said.

Even with a decrease, the numbers are formidable: 40,000 pounds of marijuana seized at the Agua Linda Road checkpoint in the 2007-08 fiscal year; 200 pounds of cocaine; 500 arrests of Mexican and U.S. citizens. From October 2008 through March 2009, agents at the

checkpoint seized 19,000 pounds of marijuana and made more than 300 arrests, Scioli said.

But they could be catching more, he said.

Out of 20 sectors in the United States, the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector is the busiest, accounting for more than 50 percent of marijuana seizures and 44 percent of all arrests, he said.

“The numbers speak for themselves,” Scioli said.

jrichardson@gvnews.com|547-9726



  Next
  No 4-day weeks for local schools

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.5 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of gvnews.com.

George wrote on May 9, 2009 5:51 AM:

" What a bunch of baloney! So you stop your car for a brief moment and you're on your way again, in no more than a minute. Typical nonsense from a group, whose selfish agenda would sacrifice an important screening tool for their own imagined bottom line. "

Lonnie wrote on May 9, 2009 8:30 AM:

" I don't see anything in the article about how much CASH going into Mexico is found, nor how many GUNS are confiscated. Seems we need a checkpoint for finding cash and arms going into Mexico and cut off the money supply. No money going out, no drugs coming in. "

Jane Horton-Leasman wrote on May 9, 2009 8:39 AM:

" Freeland and the rest of the Realtors who object to this checkpoint just care about "selling real estate".

Those of us who believe in the station care about who is coming in to this country, totally appreciate the Border Patrol presence, and are U.S. CITIZENS who care more about our safety FIRST.

Freeland, while living in Sahuarita was Bob Sharpe's "man", on the Council and as Mayor...they sold real estate, but look at the mess of whiners and cost to taxpayers they have cost this area.

If the only excuse they can find for not selling overpriced real estate in Tubac is the border station, then they should look at the misrepresentations in selling to those who have already purchased in the Tubac area. As for the shops, they think they are another "Sedona", with comparable pricing...this is not an area where shoppers spend the money, as they do in the Sedona area. You can't make a silk purse out of a pigs ear. Tubac as always been just a place where visitors go...but now they don't even have the homeowners in GV who used to live here and buy expensive decorator items for their homes and property. The economics S. of Tucson has entirely changed over the last 10 years especially.

Shutting down the flow of drugs in motor vehicles (cars and trucks) is a major vehicle. Those coming up the Santa Cruz and all over our S. desert are just illiterates primarily, coming to the land of "free" everything. Jobs? Maybe, but most are low-wage workers becoming a burden on the U.S. taxpayers! "

Carlo wrote on May 9, 2009 9:46 AM:

" <<Recently, the sector reported a decrease in arrests at the checkpoint, “which means it’s working,” Scioli said.>>

And should the numbers of arrests at Agua Linda increase does that also mean the checkpoint "is working, Mr. Scioli?"

Well, of course, because the Border Patrol is a unique police agency that can have it both ways.

Arrests down - Success!

Arrests up - Success!

Which would be amusing if the US Border Patrols overall failure rate weren't so serious.

Failure, am I so bold to claim?

Yes, because the US street price of cocaine and Maryjane has remained stable despite the billions the BP and other agencies have been wasting on the war on drugs.

Obviously, the so-called "formidable" numbers have had little impact.

Further, the pitiful amount of drugs snagged at the Agua Linda Checkpoint is downright embarrassing.

As is the arrest only 500 suspects last year.

Might it be better to declare the War on Drugs the failure it has long been to concentrate more on avoidance of drug use and, especially, treatment?

Might it also be better for the BP to re-discover, exactly, where the border is? "

Joan H. Roolf wrote on May 9, 2009 12:14 PM:

" I live part time in Green Valley. The check point does not bother me.

It seems that we need to toughen this area, so the drug smuggler's go elsewhere. Then Tubac will not have the concerns it does now. "

D.C. Nance wrote on May 10, 2009 4:44 AM:

" Tubac has more problems than the checkpoint.

High home prices compared to homes of same size and age in Green Valley; No major drugstore or grocery store; distance from Tucson and the attitude of may local residents that it's OK for illegals to come and go as they please. Now they don't like the efforts to stop the drug trade anywhere. They need to look in their own back yard ie, the Anza Trail, a much used route for illegals. I would't want a home next to it either.

Tubac would be better served if the residents and business owners would support the efforts of the Border Patrol instead of pretending they are still living in the 60s. The present economy has more to do with the lack of business in Tubac that the Border Patrol so quit blaming people who are trying to solve the problem of the illegal drug trade in Southern Arizona. "

Green Valley Citizen wrote on May 11, 2009 6:12 AM:

" The people and merchants quoted in this article, protesting the checkpoint, put their own economic interests above those of national security - Typical of a selfish 'me generation' mentality.

There are numerous reasons why business may be 'off' in Tubac, as it is 'off' nearly everywhere else - In case you haven't heard the economy is in the tank. Travel is a luxury many cannot afford. People don't buy the candlesticks and wind chimes and coyote statues that are sold in your shops when they need to use their funds to pay for their basic life needs.

There is a checkpoint in Southern California which has been there for decades but you don't hear local real estate agents whining about it, blaming it for lost sales.

Lastly, I frequently drive the 19 and I have never, ever been in line at the checkpoint for 20 minutes. Never. One can expect to wait for a few minutes at the most, and if you do not have that little time to co-operate with the Border Patrol then perhaps you should live elsewhere. "

kathy wrote on May 11, 2009 6:19 AM:

" I go to Tubac and Rio Rico often and I am not inconvenienced by the checkpoint, in fact it makes me feel more safe and secure that the border patrol is able to stop more crime coming out of Mexico. I would think that the community of Tubac could promote a positive image of the Border Patrol to help prospective buyers and shoppers to feel less apprehensive.
If the checkpoint is not wanted at Aqua Linda exit then where should it be? Rio Rico? Green Valley? Would it still be an inconvenience no matter where it is put?
What is the answer? We need the Border Patrol, it has become part of our daily world, crime is all around us and we need layers of protection. God Bless America as we need all the help we can get. "

Danny D. wrote on May 11, 2009 9:04 AM:

" Regarding the checkpoint north of Tubac.
We are Canadian tourists who have been coming to Green Valley for several years and each time have visited Tubac. When we first saw any checkpoint, and in the last couple of years the semipermanent one, we did not feel it was a problem as we understood why it was there - to protect the citizens and area. It is unfortunate that the problems exist but it appears in this day and age there is no easy solution for this. As a tourist, waiting for a few extra minutes should not be a problem as we are there to relax and enjoy the area. The price of freedom sometimes seems high.
See you in Tubac this fall.
Danny D. "

Realist wrote on May 11, 2009 9:35 AM:

" On a scale of 1 to 10 property crimes ( burglery etc. ) in Tubac are rated at 6 -the same rating as Phoenix ). The United States average is 3. It is probably safe to say that the majority of these property crimes are the 'work' of illegal aliens passing through Tubac on their way to a 'better life'. The citizens of Tubac should be extremely grateful for the Border Patrol checkpoint, unless of course they don't mind being on a par with Phoenix for property crimes. "

Ricardo de la Torre wrote on May 11, 2009 9:49 AM:

" Ms. Cullen, why in the world don't you and the other residents of the Tubac area take advantage of the fact that the checkpoint gives you the chance to assist our Border Patrol in the apprehension of these invaders.
Without the checkpoint, the illegal aliens and drugs would simply stay on the highway and thumb their noses at our law as they made their way into the land of milk and honey.
Yes, when they circumvent the checkpoint they may indeed cross near homes and close to people.
If you people cared nearly as much about your country as you do about your back yards, you would take pride in having the chance to report these individuals to the authorities and having them apprehended.
I do it all the time and I'm a 74 year old man living about 10 miles from a checkpoint.
You know Carol, this country wasn't founded by people who hid behind their sofa and expected to be taken care of, rather than seeing the benefits to America by getting involved in its security.
Shame on you. "

US Citizen in Tubac wrote on May 16, 2009 9:19 AM:

" I'm not surprised by how many of the folks commenting here, virtually all from Green Valley, support the checkpoint. I, too, would be supportive of the checkpoint if it were SOUTH of my home (like maybe AT THE BORDER!?!) where it would protect ALL U.S. citizens, not just those north of Tubac. The current placement makes absolutely no sense. Remember when the Border Patrol first claimed it needed a checkpoint on I-19 and stated that it HAD to be at kilometer 50 so they could capture those coming in from Arivaca? What happened to that argument? The good citizens of Green Valley decided it was too close to Green Valley and would cause exactly the problems that Tubac is facing now, so they abandoned that location.
And to the the "Green Valley Citizen" who wrote about the checkpoint in southern California: I used to live in San Diego and guess what? That checkpoint is closed most of the time and has been for years. So, millions of taxpayer dollars spent for what? Also, that checkpoint is NOT in the middle of a community...it's on a military base, far from any residential development. The property around the new checkpoint is zoned for residential homes. I wonder how future residents will feel about buying a home next to a 25 acre quasi-military installation.
The Border Patrol always states that the permanent checkpoint is a "second line of defense" like in football. What nonsense. How can they defend against a moving target if THEY don't move? Wouldn't those dozens of agents who will be staffing the checkpoint be better utilized by roaming the border?
Lastly, the BP throws around all kinds of numbers to justify the $27 million+ expenditure on a new checkpoint. And yet I have never heard them answer the one question that the Tubac community has asked: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS CROSSING THE BORDER ARE BEING PPREHENDED AT CHECKPOINTS? Alternatively, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE DRUGS BEING SMUGGLED ACROSS THE BORDER ARE THEY CAPTURING AT CHECKPOINTS? Without that information there is absolutely no way of knowing if checkpoints are effective or not. That is information that we must have before spending this kind of money and before deliberately harming a community of U.S. citizens. Representative Gabrielle Giffords has asked the GAO to investigate this. But the Border Patrol has REFUSED to provide the information to either the GAO or Congress. I wonder why! "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Return to: News « | Home « | Top of Page ^
 
Today's Weather
Green Valley, AZ


sponsored by:





Top Menus